[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS
From: |
Doug Kearns |
Subject: |
Re: [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS |
Date: |
Fri Oct 19 06:09:21 2001 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.23i |
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 11:40:04PM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
<snip>
> Ah! Yes, silly me. The second line should have read:
> bind C-o link o
Why not just:
link C-o o
That seems much more natural to me, and what I tried before you
corrected the syntax.
If it is going to be implemented this way, I don't think 'link' is the
correct name for the command.
For example:
:link a
resolves to :time with standard key bindings.
<snip>
Regards,
Doug
- [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS, Gergely Nagy, 2001/10/18
- Re: [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS, Martin Samuelsson, 2001/10/18
- Re: [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS, Gergely Nagy, 2001/10/18
- Re: [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS,
Doug Kearns <=
- Re: [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS, Gergely Nagy, 2001/10/19
- Re: [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS, Doug Kearns, 2001/10/20
- Re: [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS, Jonathan Walther, 2001/10/20
- Re: [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS, Doug Kearns, 2001/10/20
- Re: [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS, Gergely Nagy, 2001/10/20
- Re: [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS, Jonathan Walther, 2001/10/19
Re: [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS, shawn, 2001/10/18