Re: [RP] The `link' command, ported to current CVS

[Doug Kearns]

On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 05:23:06AM +0200, Gergely Nagy wrote:
> > > Ah! Yes, silly me. The second line should have read:
> > > bind C-o link o
> > 
> > Why not just:
> > 
> > link C-o o
> > 
> > That seems much more natural to me, and what I tried before you
> > corrected the syntax.
> 
> That would act like bind, duplicating some of it's code, that's why I
> thought that bind C-o link o is better. IMHO, it is quite
> straightforward too, for we have only one command which binds stuff to
> keys, and it binds only commands.

I can see that, it's just that I don't really think it's name reflects
what it does - it doesn't actually link anything.

Regards,
Doug