[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net
From: |
Christoph Egger |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:35:14 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) |
Gunnar Wolf <address@hidden> writes:
> Andrew Gallagher dijo [Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 10:14:01AM +0100]:
>> I'm sceptical of the utility of ECC keys personally. They were first
>> proposed as a way of reducing work and storage space (because the
>> space of usable ECC keys is more compact than the sparsely
>> distributed RSA primes). But they've taken so long to catch on that
>> technology advancement has made their original justification largely
>> irrelevant (the only exception to my knowledge being DNSSEC, where
>> signature length restrictions are still important). And because the
>> ECC keyspace is more efficiently packed, it is theoretically *more*
>> susceptible to quantum attacks.
>
> I'm far from a worthy crypto geek myself, but still — Storage space is
> not the decisive issue; storing a million 4096-bit keys is only an
> order of magnitude more than storing a million 256-bit keys (the same
> proportion would naturally apply for a single key), and information
> appended to the keys themselves (such as photo attributes and the
> signatures that constitute the web of trust) make the difference quite
> unnoticeable.
It also affects the size of each signature, certificate
| :signature packet: algo 22, keyid 1BB721A4B254D8E1
| version 4, created 1472657540, md5len 0, sigclass 0x00
| digest algo 8, begin of digest fd 82
| hashed subpkt 2 len 4 (sig created 2016-08-31)
| subpkt 16 len 8 (issuer key ID 1BB721A4B254D8E1)
| data: [256 bits]
| data: [256 bits]
vs
| :signature packet: algo 1, keyid ABFFEDB24008C6F9
| version 4, created 1472657570, md5len 0, sigclass 0x00
| digest algo 8, begin of digest c8 06
| hashed subpkt 2 len 4 (sig created 2016-08-31)
| subpkt 16 len 8 (issuer key ID ABFFEDB24008C6F9)
| data: [4095 bits]
Christoph
--
9FED 5C6C E206 B70A 5857 70CA 9655 22B9 D49A E731
Debian Developer | Lisp Hacker | CaCert Assurer
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Steven Noonan, 2016/08/30
- [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Steven Noonan, 2016/08/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Chris Boot, 2016/08/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Hillebrand van de Groep, 2016/08/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Chris Boot, 2016/08/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Andrew Gallagher, 2016/08/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Gunnar Wolf, 2016/08/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net,
Christoph Egger <=
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Andrew Gallagher, 2016/08/31