[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net
From: |
Andrew Gallagher |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net |
Date: |
Wed, 31 Aug 2016 17:01:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/45.2.0 |
On 31/08/16 16:18, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
> Adding is way cheaper
> for a computer than multiplying, so your hardware will be able to
> perform many, many more cryptographic operations with ECC than with
> RSA.
That's a good argument for using EECDH in TLS, which is fair enough -
with ephemeral keys it's legitimate to prioritise speed. But it's less
applicable to PGP or x509, where the processing cost of the asym
sig/crypt is comparatively small.
A
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Steven Noonan, 2016/08/30
- [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Steven Noonan, 2016/08/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Chris Boot, 2016/08/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Hillebrand van de Groep, 2016/08/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Chris Boot, 2016/08/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Andrew Gallagher, 2016/08/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Gunnar Wolf, 2016/08/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net, Christoph Egger, 2016/08/31
- Re: [Sks-devel] peer request for pgp.uplinklabs.net,
Andrew Gallagher <=