[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Social] More internal use of ActivityStreams?
From: |
Mikael Nordfeldth |
Subject: |
Re: [Social] More internal use of ActivityStreams? |
Date: |
Wed, 02 Jan 2013 19:22:23 +0100 |
On ons 2 jan 2013 18:48:10, hellekin (GNU Consensus) <address@hidden> wrote:
> > If so, how far into the future is that? And would it be easier to
> > migrate from GNU Social's current homebrew structure - or something
> > properly specified like ActivityStreams?
> >
> > Its happening already. Just join the fun!
> >
> *** It is one of the purposes of the GNU/consensus project to specify an
> implementation-agnostic social object layer for free software projects
> to interoperate. This is a public debate, and you're invited to chime in.
I joined this list now at least. Thanks for pointing me there.
- Re: [Social] More internal use of ActivityStreams?, (continued)
- Re: [Social] More internal use of ActivityStreams?, Melvin Carvalho, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Social] More internal use of ActivityStreams?, Mikael Nordfeldth, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Social] More internal use of ActivityStreams?, Melvin Carvalho, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Social] More internal use of ActivityStreams?, Mikael Nordfeldth, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Social] More internal use of ActivityStreams?, Melvin Carvalho, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Social] More internal use of ActivityStreams?, Rob Myers, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Social] More internal use of ActivityStreams?, Melvin Carvalho, 2013/01/02
- Message not available
- Re: [Social] [GNU/consensus] More internal use of ActivityStreams?, Melvin Carvalho, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Social] More internal use of ActivityStreams?, hellekin (GNU Consensus), 2013/01/02
- Re: [Social] More internal use of ActivityStreams?, Melvin Carvalho, 2013/01/02
- Re: [Social] More internal use of ActivityStreams?,
Mikael Nordfeldth <=