[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1
From: |
Jim Johnson |
Subject: |
RE: Problem with upgrade from 0.2.0.0 to 0.3.1 |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Jul 2006 08:41:57 -0500 |
> The description of `-b' (and therefore `-B' too) is:
>
> -b spamaddress
> Redirects tagged spam to the specified email
> address. [...]
>
> So every email that is spam goes to the specified email. That's
> something I want: I want to hold spam in a local file to review from
> time to time. However, this file can get filled pretty quickly during
> Spam storms, and I never bother with anything above 8 or so. Then I
> see this:
>
> -r nn Reject scanned email if it greater than or
> equal to nn.
> [..]
>
> Sounds perfect. *My* understanding was that with a standard 5.0 SA
> threshold and `-r 10', anything below 5.0 gets delivered, things
> between 5 and 10 are caught by the above -b spamaddress, and anything
> beyond that is rejected with *no trace*. Now, that can be defective
> understanding on my part...
That exactly how I wanted and thought it would work too. To ease server
maintenance at the small shop I work at we try to use RPMs exclusively, so I
hope your changes can make it back into the standard RPMs. I'm sure there's
lots of users who would appreciate having this functionality.