[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix.
From: |
Don Armstrong |
Subject: |
Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix. |
Date: |
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 12:21:22 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Tue, 08 Jun 2010, Tony Shadwick wrote:
> Although I must acknowledge this as a problem, this is somewhat the
> fault of a negligent systems administrator.
It's primarily the fault of the coder for calling out to the shell
instead of specifying the arguments directly using popenv or similar.
> So far as fixing -x...I just don't know. Maybe some sanity checking
> to make sure that there are no pipe symbols in the address being
> passed through?
-x has *already* been fixed in versions that are distributed by Debian
and Fedora, and presumably Ubuntu, Redhat and others.
Don Armstrong
--
[The] JK-88 [coffee] percolator is capable of acheiving the ultimate
balance of aroma and density, aftertaste and emollience, pentosans and
tannins. The next step is to reduce the cost of the HPLC-E technology
to the point where it can be manufactured for less than the cost of a
Boeing 757.
-- Charles Stross "Extracts from the Club Diary" in _Toast_ p83-4
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/07
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Don Armstrong, 2010/06/07
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/08
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/08
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix.,
Don Armstrong <=
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/08
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/08
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Don Armstrong, 2010/06/08
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/09
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/10
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Don Armstrong, 2010/06/10