[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix.
From: |
Don Armstrong |
Subject: |
Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix. |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:18:06 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010, Tony Shadwick wrote:
> So instead of just doing popen() based on a specific format, now
> we're specifying what arguments get passed using popenv(), which is
> passed an array. That's fine, but what changes?
It's the difference between `` and IPC::Open2; if you're more familiar
with perl. [No shell gets called at all.]
See http://sial.org/howto/perl/backticks/ or similar.
Don Armstrong
--
Love is... a complex sequence of neurochemical reactions that makes
people behave like idiots. It's similar to intoxication, but the
hangover's even worse.
-- J. Jacques _Questionable Content_ #1039
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1039
http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/07
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Don Armstrong, 2010/06/07
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/08
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/08
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Don Armstrong, 2010/06/08
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/08
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/08
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Don Armstrong, 2010/06/08
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/09
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix., Tony Shadwick, 2010/06/10
- Re: -x on Postfix, and a possible fix.,
Don Armstrong <=