[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz
From: |
Thomas Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz |
Date: |
Wed, 26 Mar 2008 18:09:32 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 08:01:17PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
20080325
+ correct bytes versus characters for inserting/replacing text in
utf-8 buffers (reports by Chris Green, Paul Van Tilburg).
Hmm, nothing changed for me.. characters with accents still get inserted
as \xC3.
Anything I can test?
I'm puzzled, since it's working for me (I tried nl_NL.utf8 here).
So I'm either building it differently, or running it differently.
Is this in insert-mode? With some specific characters? Perhaps the
driver is related: If it's configured --with-screen=curses or
--with-screen=ncurses, those are not UTF-8 capable (though
--with-screen=ncursesw should work). I'm generally using the default
terminfo/termcap driver.
I assume you're setting file-encoding=utf-8 as mentioned last week.
Without a specific setting, vile's reading characters according to
the locale (with or without iconv), and applying them to the buffers
according to _their_ file-encoding.
With xterm, I "just" use a meta-whatever to get upper-128 codes
(which uxterm translates into UTF-8). A quick check using vile's
^VxNN seems to be working.
The only odd thing that I'm seeing at the moment is when editing
with file-encoding=auto, that I didn't provide a clear way to
see what encoding the current buffer is using in the [Settings]
window. I can do a ":show-var" and see $encoding in the [Variables],
and that's consistent.
--
Thomas E. Dickey
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, (continued)
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/26
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/26
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/26
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Chris G, 2008/03/27
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/27
Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2008/03/26
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/26
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz,
Thomas Dickey <=
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2008/03/30
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/30
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/30
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2008/03/30
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/30
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/30
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2008/03/31
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/31
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2008/03/31
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/31