[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz
From: |
Paul van Tilburg |
Subject: |
Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:36:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:55:30AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Mon, 31 Mar 2008, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
>>> Here's what I have in my /etc/locale.gen for nl_NL and en_US lines:
>>>
>>> nl_NL ISO-8859-1
>>> nl_NL.UTF-8 UTF-8
>>>
>>> en_US ISO-8859-1
>>> en_US.ISO-8859-15 ISO-8859-15
>>> en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8
>>
>> Here is mine:
>>
>> en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8
>> nl_NL.UTF-8 UTF-8
>>
>> So maybe that's why the normal latin{1,9} stuff isn't working?
I have performed a test: I also enabled the "narrow" nl_NL locale
and now I suddenly see accented letters!
I never use the latin1/latin9 loales (nl_NL or address@hidden), so I had
disabled
them. Strange that I need them?
Paul
--
PhD Student @ Eindhoven | email: address@hidden
University of Technology, The Netherlands | JID: address@hidden
>>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, (continued)
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/26
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/26
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2008/03/30
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/30
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/30
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2008/03/30
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/30
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/30
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2008/03/31
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/31
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz,
Paul van Tilburg <=
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6j.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/03/31