[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz
From: |
Paul van Tilburg |
Subject: |
Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Apr 2008 18:42:35 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 09:04:28AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:52:47PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>>> patch by Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
>>> + update list of filters in doc/config.doc
>>> + improve locale initialization, checking if there is no installed
>>> narrow locale corresponding to the given (wide) locale. In that
>>> case, default to either ISO-8859-1 or ASCII, depending on whether
>>> there was actually a wide locale whose encoding is UTF-8 or
>>> ISO-8859-1, or neither (report by Paul Van Tilburg).
>>
>> Works great! Thanks!
>> Uploading this to Debian Sid. :)
>
> no problem - let's see if this looks stable enough for 9.7
Actually... there is one thing I'd like to discuss.
If file-encoding is set to auto, it will inspect the buffer to decide
what to do which seems to default to '8bit' to my systems (inspecting
$encoding) when editting an empty/new file.
It would IMO be more sane to set the default based on the locale.
I have set LC_CTYPE to an UTF-8 locale exactly for that purpose.
If this is done, this still works for editting latin1/latin9 files
or ASCII files.
What do you think?
Regards,
Paul
>
> --
> Thomas E. Dickey
> http://invisible-island.net
> ftp://invisible-island.net
>
--
PhD Student @ Eindhoven | email: address@hidden
University of Technology, The Netherlands | JID: address@hidden
>>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181
- [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/04/10
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2008/04/12
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/04/12
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz,
Paul van Tilburg <=
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Chris G, 2008/04/14
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/04/14
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/04/16
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2008/04/17
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/04/17