[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz
From: |
Chris G |
Subject: |
Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:51:21 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 06:42:35PM +0200, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 09:04:28AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> > On Sat, 12 Apr 2008, Paul van Tilburg wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 08:52:47PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> >>> patch by Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
> >>> + update list of filters in doc/config.doc
> >>> + improve locale initialization, checking if there is no installed
> >>> narrow locale corresponding to the given (wide) locale. In that
> >>> case, default to either ISO-8859-1 or ASCII, depending on whether
> >>> there was actually a wide locale whose encoding is UTF-8 or
> >>> ISO-8859-1, or neither (report by Paul Van Tilburg).
> >>
> >> Works great! Thanks!
> >> Uploading this to Debian Sid. :)
> >
> > no problem - let's see if this looks stable enough for 9.7
>
> Actually... there is one thing I'd like to discuss.
> If file-encoding is set to auto, it will inspect the buffer to decide
> what to do which seems to default to '8bit' to my systems (inspecting
> $encoding) when editting an empty/new file.
> It would IMO be more sane to set the default based on the locale.
> I have set LC_CTYPE to an UTF-8 locale exactly for that purpose.
> If this is done, this still works for editting latin1/latin9 files
> or ASCII files.
>
> What do you think?
>
Yes, I'd go for that approach, if there's an LC_CTYPE setting or a
LANG setting vile should use that as the default file encoding.
--
Chris Green
- [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/04/10
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2008/04/12
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/04/12
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2008/04/14
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz,
Chris G <=
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/04/14
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/04/16
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Paul van Tilburg, 2008/04/17
- Re: [vile] vile-9.6k.patch.gz, Thomas Dickey, 2008/04/17