[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vile] mini-buffer question
From: |
Paul Fox |
Subject: |
Re: [vile] mini-buffer question |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Mar 2015 20:11:07 -0400 |
wayne wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 01:56:44PM -0400, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> > I would certainly prefer having to hit ^V prior to inserting "special"
> > characters, but I'm the only one who uses vile. Not only is that the
> > traditional vi behavior but most shells default to that as well. Of
> > course it can be worked around but in my old age my muscle memory takes
> > precedence over my mental memory :)
>
> HA HA that should have read "not the only one who uses vile". That one
> gave me a laugh.
my thought was, "well, i think there are at least 3 of us..." :-)
=----------------------
paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 24.8 degrees)
- [vile] mini-buffer question, Wayne Cuddy, 2015/03/04
- Re: [vile] mini-buffer question, Thomas Dickey, 2015/03/04
- Re: [vile] mini-buffer question, Thomas Dickey, 2015/03/10
- Re: [vile] mini-buffer question, Paul Fox, 2015/03/10
- Re: [vile] mini-buffer question, Thomas Dickey, 2015/03/11
- Re: [vile] mini-buffer question, Wayne Cuddy, 2015/03/12
- Re: [vile] mini-buffer question, Wayne Cuddy, 2015/03/12
- Re: [vile] mini-buffer question,
Paul Fox <=
- Re: [vile] mini-buffer question, j. van den hoff, 2015/03/13
- Re: [vile] mini-buffer question, Thomas Dickey, 2015/03/13
- Re: [vile] mini-buffer question, Gary Jennejohn, 2015/03/13
- Re: [vile] mini-buffer question, Thomas Dickey, 2015/03/13
- Re: [vile] mini-buffer question, Thomas Dickey, 2015/03/13
- Re: [vile] mini-buffer question, Thomas Dickey, 2015/03/13