[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: updated win32 macro
From: |
Christopher Faylor |
Subject: |
Re: updated win32 macro |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:51:34 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.11i |
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 12:54:01AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>> I still don't think all of this fuss is really worth it but I'm going
>to
>> add my 29 cents worth in this thread.
>>
>> AISI, what is needed is only whether or not the the compiler supports
>a
>> -mwin32 switch. Then the configure.in can use it.
>
>Not true if you want to support users with cygwin gcc 2.95.2-6. That's
>what I didn't like about the code Chris was putting in his configure.in
>and prompted me to put into practice what I'd been thinking about.
I'm not sure what you're referring to but anything I posted would
accomodate older or newer compilers.
I am very happy to see an autoconf option for this, though. That's
what I was hoping for.
cgf
- Re: win32 compiler test V3a, (continued)
- V4a win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/16
- Re: V4a win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/16
- Re: V4a win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/16
- Re: V4a win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/16
- RE: V4a win32 macro, Tim Van Holder, 2001/03/17
- Re: win32 compiler test V3a, Thomas E. Dickey, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro,
Christopher Faylor <=
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Christopher Faylor, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Christopher Faylor, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Christopher Faylor, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/19
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/19
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/19