[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: updated win32 macro
From: |
Christopher Faylor |
Subject: |
Re: updated win32 macro |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Mar 2001 19:08:30 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.11i |
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 09:56:43AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>So in a nutshell, because some packages change CFLAGS, and others change
>CC, we require everyone to change their Makefiles ?
>
>I agree that overriding CC is bad - thats why it was changed to CFLAGS.
>But CFLAGS is the standard way of changing the compiler behaviour - why
>do the makefiles over ride that? And how common a practice is that?
>
>In fact, on second thought, packages that override CFLAGS just use the
>low level interface
>AC_PROG_CC_WIN32
>EXTRA_CFLAGS="$WIN32FLAGS"
I'm sure that the autoconf maintainers have more experience with this
than I, but IMO relying on overriding of CC and CFLAGS isn't the way to
go. When I first started changing things, I thought I could use this
technique but I think it is too fragile.
cgf
- Re: V4a win32 macro, (continued)
- Re: win32 compiler test V3a, Thomas E. Dickey, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Christopher Faylor, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Christopher Faylor, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Christopher Faylor, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro,
Christopher Faylor <=
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/19
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/19
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/19
- win32 v4, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Christopher Faylor, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Lars J. Aas, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Lars J. Aas, 2001/03/15
Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15