[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: updated win32 macro
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: updated win32 macro |
Date: |
19 Mar 2001 12:52:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
>>>>> "Robert" == Robert Collins <address@hidden> writes:
Robert> Wasn't that for the low level interface? Which I've done - it
Robert> defines WIN32FLAGS...
This is fine! Most people will not want to bother, and having it into
CFLAGS is fine, there is nothing else to do. And your low level one
gives the means to tune exactly what the user wants. That's the
perfect balance!
- Re: updated win32 macro, (continued)
- Re: updated win32 macro, Christopher Faylor, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Christopher Faylor, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Christopher Faylor, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/19
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/19
- Re: updated win32 macro,
Akim Demaille <=
- win32 v4, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Robert Collins, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Christopher Faylor, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Lars J. Aas, 2001/03/15
- Re: updated win32 macro, Lars J. Aas, 2001/03/15
Re: updated win32 macro, Akim Demaille, 2001/03/15