[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2.49e problems with gcc
From: |
Akim Demaille |
Subject: |
Re: 2.49e problems with gcc |
Date: |
10 May 2001 15:34:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) |
>>>>> "Thomas" == Thomas E Dickey <address@hidden> writes:
Thomas> check/see if it (gcc's configure script) uses changequote().
Thomas> That feature is broken in the current alpha versions of
Thomas> autoconf, has been reported a few times (and shows up with
Thomas> this symptom).
Akim> No Thomas, you can't say this, this is unfair. You referred to
Akim> this several times, but I never saw any actual code that
Akim> demonstrates the problem. I'm fine with fixing things I can
Akim> see.
Thomas> no, I'm being fair (and precise). I saw 2-3 reports earlier
Thomas> this year reporting it, and each time you stated that the
Thomas> configure.in's were relying on some defect in autoconf 2.13
So I guess this is a misunderstanding. I do agree 2.50 and 2.13
sometimes disagree on quotation rules, although we paid attention to
keeping backward compatibility for most cases. But each time you
referred to changequote and I really thought you were referring to
something we broke wrt it.
Thomas> (no point in adding reports, only to be told that my scripts
Thomas> also were wrong ;-)
:)
Sorry if I hurt you. It's probably only a problem related to
vocabulary.
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, (continued)
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Tim Van Holder, 2001/05/11
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Akim Demaille, 2001/05/12
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Akim Demaille, 2001/05/12
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Tim Van Holder, 2001/05/16
- RE: 2.49e problems with gcc, Tim Van Holder, 2001/05/17
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Akim Demaille, 2001/05/19
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Thomas Dickey, 2001/05/19
- Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Tim Van Holder, 2001/05/16
Re: 2.49e problems with gcc, Akim Demaille, 2001/05/10