[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 07:56:47 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Hi David,
* David Fang wrote on Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 04:04:19AM CET:
>
> What I'd like is AC_CONFIG_FILES to also perform a difference
> check on the output files before overwriting them, just the way
> AC_CONFIG_HEADERS does. (Is this a safe and easy request to accommodate?)
Maybe you can have an intermediate file created from config.status
(AC_CONFIG_FILES), and then use move-if-change to the header, in
conjunction with a stamp file. I'm not sure whether there are make
implementations that don't cope well with this scheme, nor whether
that is due to bugs in them.
Cheers,
Ralf
- AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, David Fang, 2005/12/12
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, David Fang, 2005/12/17
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, David Fang, 2005/12/17
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/12/18
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Harlan Stenn, 2005/12/18
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, David Fang, 2005/12/18
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Harlan Stenn, 2005/12/18
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/12/19
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Harlan Stenn, 2005/12/19
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Bruce Korb, 2005/12/19
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/12/19