[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES
From: |
Ralf Corsepius |
Subject: |
Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:14:35 +0100 |
On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 00:15 +0000, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> The problem with doing these things in configure is that one must rerun
> configure to regenerate the file.
>
> Sometimes it is better do produce these things in config.status.
There is no need to do so, in this case, because the file is being
generated when running configure.
"config.status --recheck", runs configure, so changes to configure.ac
automatically get propagated to the generated file.
Ralf
- AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, David Fang, 2005/12/12
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/12/15
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, David Fang, 2005/12/17
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, David Fang, 2005/12/17
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/12/18
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Harlan Stenn, 2005/12/18
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, David Fang, 2005/12/18
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Harlan Stenn, 2005/12/18
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES,
Ralf Corsepius <=
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Harlan Stenn, 2005/12/19
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Bruce Korb, 2005/12/19
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Bob Friesenhahn, 2005/12/19
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Bruce Korb, 2005/12/19
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/12/19
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Harlan Stenn, 2005/12/19
- Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES, Ralf Corsepius, 2005/12/19