|
| From: | Bruce Korb |
| Subject: | Re: AC_CONFIG_HEADERS vs. AC_CONFIG_FILES |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Dec 2005 12:26:37 -0800 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20050923) |
Harlan Stenn wrote:
For packages that are "big enough" (ie, that have a large/slow run of "configure"), this is an unnacceptable solution.
Even small packages with few needs beyond what ought to be simple, vanilla POSIX stuff require monsterous configs. Isn't everything "big enough"? :)
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |