Re: No release for 2 years?

[Dalibor Topic]

On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 03:01:56PM +0000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > I hold the necessity of
> >m4-2.0 for autoconf-2.60 to be a myth.  Is that correct?  If not, why?
> 
> Yes that's correct.
> 
> The searchpath manipulation primitives of m4-2.0 are required to do away
> with aclocal, which was (when m4-2.0 seemed much closer!) something that
> I think Akim wanted in the next release of autoconf.
> 
> I don't know of any reason why we couldn't put out an alpha of autoconf
> right now.  Then after a whole lot of platform testing, fixing any bugs
> that fall out, a 2.60 release seems perfectly feasible.
> 

Yes, please. :)

Btw, what happened to 2.59b ?

cheers,
dalibor topic

> Cheers,
>       Gary.
> -- 
> Gary V. Vaughan      ())_.  address@hidden,gnu.org}
> Research Scientist   ( '/   http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
> GNU Hacker           / )=   http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
> Technical Author   `(_~)_   http://sources.redhat.com/autobook



> _______________________________________________
> Autoconf mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/autoconf