[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Aug 2008 18:35:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Hello,
* address@hidden wrote on Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 06:07:22PM CEST:
>
> >From the very beginning, lies my intention in this point: As there are
> features to correct and implement, I do not want to have any extra
> headaches from the svn users like "Oh, i can't `make install` it here"
> and then i have to troubleshoot that also, finding out that the
> configure.ac/Makefile.ams has/have been manipulated -wrongly-..
You might as well weight that with the case where the user knows better
than you or autotools; i.e., where your build system was not portable
enough for some reason.
Making dealing with newbie users easier is a good motivation, but doing
so at the cost of hurting users that actually know better is often not
worth it, at least in the long run.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, js_bach, 2008/08/21
- Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, js_bach, 2008/08/21
- Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, John W. Eaton, 2008/08/21
- Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, Tim Post, 2008/08/21
- Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/22
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, Yavor Doganov, 2008/08/22
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, John Calcote, 2008/08/22
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/08/22
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, John Calcote, 2008/08/22
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, Ineiev, 2008/08/25
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/08/25