[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question
From: |
Yavor Doganov |
Subject: |
Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Aug 2008 07:38:33 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black) |
В Fri, 22 Aug 2008 11:21:04 +0800, Tim Post написа:
> The GPL requires only that you make the source code available with all
> files needed to complete the build. So, in essence, you could exclude
> the things needed to rebuild the build system, but you would alienate
> anyone who is willing to help you 'properize' it.
IMVHO not shipping configure.ac and Makefile.am is a GPL violation --
they are quite clearly the preferred form for modification, and the build
system is an integral part of any software package. Users of a free
software package should be ably to effectively modify or enhance the
build system on equal terms with the author, just like any other parts of
the source code.
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, (continued)
Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, js_bach, 2008/08/21
Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, js_bach, 2008/08/21
- Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/21
- Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, John W. Eaton, 2008/08/21
- Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, Tim Post, 2008/08/21
- Re: Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/08/22
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question,
Yavor Doganov <=
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, John Calcote, 2008/08/22
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/08/22
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, John Calcote, 2008/08/22
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, Ineiev, 2008/08/25
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/08/25
- Re: configure.ac, Makefile.am question, Thomas Dickey, 2008/08/25