[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX
From: |
Jeffrey Walton |
Subject: |
Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX |
Date: |
Thu, 31 Mar 2016 12:31:11 -0400 |
>> That is not a bug, it was a desired feature...
>
> Huh. How is not finding a viable compiler when one is present a desired
> feature?
+1. I kinda laughed when I read that, too.
Apparently the project has a set of goals, and breaking the
configuration and compile in some instances meets the goals. Hence the
reason I laughed.
Jeff
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX, Paul Eggert, 2016/03/15
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX, Václav Haisman, 2016/03/16
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX, Earnie, 2016/03/16
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX, Ruben Safir, 2016/03/30
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX, Václav Haisman, 2016/03/31
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX,
Jeffrey Walton <=
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX, Ruben Safir, 2016/03/31
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX, Ruben Safir, 2016/03/31
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX, Václav Haisman, 2016/03/31
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX, Ruben Safir, 2016/03/31
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX, Ruben Safir, 2016/03/31
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX, Ruben Safir, 2016/03/31
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX, Ruben Safir, 2016/03/31
- Re: Add clang++ to AC_PROG_CXX, Russ Allbery, 2016/03/31