|
From: | Georg-Johann Lay |
Subject: | Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performance |
Date: | Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:08:49 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) |
Weddington, Eric schrieb:
-----Original Message-----From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hiddenorg] On Behalf Of Georg-Johann Lay Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2009 9:00 AM To: Nicholas Vinen Cc: address@hidden Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performanceNote that this may partially be covered by report 145284 (which I cannot find, maybe Eric has closed/removed it)
Sorry, my mistake. I wrote the patch because I saw gcc 4 making bad code (campared with 3.4.6) and read some bad-optimization reports that address the subject on similar code.
It was not initiated by a specific report. However, several bug reports on "performance regression" will be fixed/get some release by that patch.
> I'm sorry, but on which project?BTW, is there a reason why there is more than one bug list? I saw a third, but cannot find it again (maybe just a view on the sourceforge list).
http://www.nongnu.org/avr-libc/bugs.html http://sourceforge.net/tracker2/?group_id=68108&atid=520074 Georg-Johann
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |