[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition
From: |
Frédéric Nadeau |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:32:07 -0400 |
Good news... I finished(or so I think) the modification to the script.
I have include two files. First is a XML generated by the first part
of the script. It use the AVR Studio XML file to do so. Second file is
the actual ioxxx.h to witch vector patch and pin definition patch have
been applied.
As a side note, all AT90USB in AVR Studio XML do not containt
<PACKAGE> information, therefore my script did not work for
these(witch result in missing information for at90usb2.h and
at90usb6_7.h)
Comments on the result are welcome
Frédéric Nadeau
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Frédéric Nadeau <address@hidden> wrote:
> Sorry my bad. it's patch-header.py:
>
> home = os.environ['HOME']
>
> xmls = home + "/src/jtagII/xml/Partdescriptionfiles"
> headers = home + "/src/avr-libc/include/avr"
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 2:06 PM, Weddington, Eric
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From:
>>> address@hidden
>>> [mailto:address@hidden
>>> org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:53 AM
>>> To: address@hidden
>>> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition
>>>
>>> I do agree with you for the naming, I thought at fist that it will be
>>> nice to know that it is an Active Low pin, but as you mention, it does
>>> not worth breaking naming pattern.
>>>
>>> I also like the idea of modifying the XML to header script.
>>>
>>> I'm looking at it and the code refer to:
>>> src/jtagII/xml/Partdescriptionfiles
>>
>> ? I didn't know it refers to that path, but...
>>
>>> Is those the same that the one that comes with AVR Studio? If not,
>>> where can I get them.
>>
>> Yes, the XML files to use are those that are shipped with AVR Studio.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>
iom8.h
Description: Text document
ATmega8.xml
Description: Text Data
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, (continued)
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Oleksandr Redchuk, 2009/03/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/10
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/10
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/10
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/11
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/11
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/11
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition,
Frédéric Nadeau <=
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/12
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Ron Kreymborg, 2009/03/13
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/13
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/13
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/13
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/13
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/13
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/16
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/19
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/24