[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Mar 2009 07:09:09 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
> Sent: Friday, March 13, 2009 6:55 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition
>
> I'm looking at the two USB definition that are missing iousbxx2.h and
> iousbxx6_7.h to add pin definition by hand. I'm stuck with the
> following dilemma:
>
> In data sheet for AT90USB646 as well as the one for AT90USB82, Clock
> pin for the SPI module is name in the pin description section as SCLK
> where as in the rest of the datasheet(specially in the SPI section) it
> is refered as SCK. All other devices that I know of use SCK for SPI
> clock.
>
> It is not much of a problem for AT90USB646, but AT90USB82 also
> implement a PS/2 module, witch in his turn define a pin as SCK.
>
> So datasheets are not consistent on SCK Vs SCLK for SPI clock.
>
> If it were only of me I would rename SPI clock pin to SCK for both and
> rename SCK to SCLK for PS/2 module in AT90USB82 case. But I'm not the
> one writing the datasheet. Although they do have job openings in Ulm
> and Heilbronn, but my German skill are only at B1 level :(
>
Keep it consistent and do SCK across all devices. Send an email to atmel about
their datasheet inconsistencies.
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, (continued)
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/10
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/11
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/11
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/11
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/12
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/12
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Ron Kreymborg, 2009/03/13
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/13
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/13
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition,
Weddington, Eric <=
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/13
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/13
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/16
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/19
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/24
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/25
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Ron Kreymborg, 2009/03/26
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/26
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/26
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Ron Kreymborg, 2009/03/26