[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 15:26:09 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Frédéric Nadeau
> Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2009 1:32 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition
>
> Good news... I finished(or so I think) the modification to the script.
>
> I have include two files. First is a XML generated by the first part
> of the script. It use the AVR Studio XML file to do so.
I'm sorry, but my memory is going: What will this new generated XML file be
used for?
> Second file is
> the actual ioxxx.h to witch vector patch and pin definition patch have
> been applied.
Looks very good. One very minor formatting request: can we have an extra blank
line put in between the pin definitions "group" and the previous group? I've
been trying to keep 2 blank lines in between groups.
I really appreciate all the work that you're doing on this! :-)
> As a side note, all AT90USB in AVR Studio XML do not containt
> <PACKAGE> information, therefore my script did not work for
> these(witch result in missing information for at90usb2.h and
> at90usb6_7.h)
Can you send an email to avr AT atmel DOT com about this? Please tell them that
I requested that they get this data fixed.
Thanks,
Eric Weddington
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, (continued)
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/10
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/10
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/10
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/10
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/11
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/11
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/11
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/12
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition,
Weddington, Eric <=
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Ron Kreymborg, 2009/03/13
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/13
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/13
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/13
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/13
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/13
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/16
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/19
- Message not available
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/24
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Nice to have: XCK Definition, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/03/25