[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 09:41:31 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Ruddick Lawrence
> Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 9:30 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon
> AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc
>
> I too agree that the license is not even a point of discussion.
> As for the style (camel vs. underscore), I'm not sure we
> really came to a
> conclusion on that.
I didn't know that the style is called "camel". :-)
Personally I find the camel style hard to read. Having spaces (underscores)
help to separate words, just like what we do when we write our natural
language.
SomehowIDon'tThinkThatNaturalLanguageWouldBeEasierToReadIfEveryoneWroteInCamelStyle.
I also find that camel style slows down my typing, but YMMV. Camel style is
also very Microsoft-ish, whereas lowercase style with underscores is very
typical of the C language and C run time library.
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, (continued)
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, wutje, 2009/09/21
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/09/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ruddick Lawrence, 2009/09/18
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Weddington, Eric, 2009/09/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ruddick Lawrence, 2009/09/18
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ron Kreymborg, 2009/09/19
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Weddington, Eric, 2009/09/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ruddick Lawrence, 2009/09/19
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ruud Vlaming, 2009/09/19
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Weddington, Eric, 2009/09/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Mike Perks, 2009/09/19
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Weddington, Eric, 2009/09/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Mike Perks, 2009/09/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ruud Vlaming, 2009/09/20
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ruud Vlaming, 2009/09/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/09/19
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ron Kreymborg, 2009/09/19
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Weddington, Eric, 2009/09/18