[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc
From: |
Ruud Vlaming |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc |
Date: |
Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:13:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
On Saturday 19 September 2009 17:41, Weddington, Eric wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > As for the style (camel vs. underscore), I'm not sure we
> > really came to a conclusion on that.
Ok, kicking in from the side line ... I am very pleased
with the initiative.
> Personally I find the camel style hard to read. Having spaces
> (underscores) help to separate words,
Exactly the reason why i don't use them. I like a compact code style
so the few spaces present should stand out as spaces. I often confuse
the underscore with spaces. Its camelCase for me, that is, in my own
programs. But i would certainly say, make the new lib in the style
of what is already there. Don't mix styles.
> Camel style is also very Microsoft-ish, whereas lowercase style
> with underscores is very typical of the C language and C run
> time library.
The latter maybe be true, the former is no argument at all,
and even if so, whats wrong with Microsoft apart from a
few of their operating systems and most of their programms?
I did not know they invented camel, (lets look, i think
i have some old basic programs on the PET in camel),
and even if they did, lets pick the cherries. (But probably
they copied it from someone too ... ;-)
Well anyway, nice that this is all hapening!!
Ruud
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, (continued)
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Weddington, Eric, 2009/09/18
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, wutje, 2009/09/21
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/09/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ruddick Lawrence, 2009/09/18
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Weddington, Eric, 2009/09/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ruddick Lawrence, 2009/09/18
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ron Kreymborg, 2009/09/19
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Weddington, Eric, 2009/09/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ruddick Lawrence, 2009/09/19
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Weddington, Eric, 2009/09/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc,
Ruud Vlaming <=
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Weddington, Eric, 2009/09/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Mike Perks, 2009/09/19
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Weddington, Eric, 2009/09/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Mike Perks, 2009/09/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ruud Vlaming, 2009/09/20
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ruud Vlaming, 2009/09/19
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Frédéric Nadeau, 2009/09/19
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Ron Kreymborg, 2009/09/19
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlibfunctionalitytoavr-libc, Weddington, Eric, 2009/09/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] Adding (some) Procyon AVRlib functionality to avr-libc, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/09/18