[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] reproducibility of a segmentation fault when the c
From: |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] reproducibility of a segmentation fault when the compiler encounters a macro (with $lisp) badly indented |
Date: |
20 Aug 2006 05:09:00 +0200 |
"Bill Page" <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
| On August 19, 2006 1:15 PM Ralf Hemmecke wrote:
| >
| > ...
| > Anyway that is a very good example why pile syntax is
| > terrible.
| >
|
| Ralf, I am sorry but your comment makes be rather angry. :(
| I cannot understand why an otherwise very intelligent
| programmer would blame the language for how a compiler
| handles a syntax error. Arrrgh!
Well, I find the pile stuff a terrible language feature.
But, I suspect we have been through that before...
-- Gaby
- Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, root, 2006/08/19
- RE: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Bill Page, 2006/08/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/08/20
- RE: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Bill Page, 2006/08/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/08/20
- RE: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Bill Page, 2006/08/20
- RE: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, C Y, 2006/08/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Martin Rubey, 2006/08/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Ralf Hemmecke, 2006/08/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] #pile vs. non-#pile, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/08/20
- Re: [Axiom-developer] reproducibility of a segmentation fault when the compiler encounters a macro (with $lisp) badly indented,
Gabriel Dos Reis <=