Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom meeting at ISSAC

[Bill Page]

On 7/31/07, C Y wrote:
> --- Bill Page wrote:
> ...
> >
> > I dont know anything about Intellectual property laws in the US but
> > isnt "Axiom" too common a word to qualify as a trademark?
>
> The fact that NAG DID have it registered as a trademark when it was a
> commercial product would seem to be conclusive proof that it is not too
> common to qualify.  Many other "common" words act as trademarks - have
> a look in the uspto's trademark search engine.
>

Actually isn't the Axiom "trademark" the logo with the character i
having both an upper and lower dot? (See
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org ) Maybe that is what makes it
sufficiently unique?

Regards,
Bill Page