Re: Renaming muscles

[Akim Demaille]

| > I must say I had that problem when I renamed them.  My problem is that
| > I'm a prefix person (i.e., I much prefer rules_sth than sth_rule.
| > Then I prefered `number' since that closer to the names used in
| > internal.
| > 
| > Nevertheless, I'm fine with changing these.  But I'd prefer having
| > other opinions: should I use `states_count' etc?
| 
| You mean for the types?  I don't think so, from their names, I'd guess
| they really refer to a state's numeric ID; as such, state_number_t is a
| perfectly fine name.

Yes, I was really focusing on the issue you raised.

| For final_state_number etc., the _number suffix is probably not
| necessary;

I made this for consistency.

| final_state adequately reflects that this refers to the final state.
| 
| In any case, it would be state_count, not states_count if it evaluated
| to
| the number of states in the machine.

Hm.  So really, states_number is wrong?  Well, you have the final
call:

        - nstates
        - number_of_states
        - states_number_of
        - states_number
        - state_count