[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex
From: |
Andreas Breitbach |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Jun 2009 21:32:54 +0200 |
Am Freitag, den 26.06.2009, 18:25 +0200 schrieb Ralf Angeli:
> * Andreas Breitbach (2009-06-26) writes:
>
> > Ok, that's exactly what I did.
> > Removed Emacs and anything connected with it, reinstalled it(The
> > respective packages were emacs22, emacs22-common, emacs,
> > emacs22-bin-common, emacs22-gtk, emacsen-common and emcas-goodies-el).
> >
> > Then I downloaded the Makefile from CVS, having this content:
> > # Where local software is found
> > prefix=/usr/local
> >
> > # Where info files go.
> > infodir=$(prefix)/share/info
> >
> > # Where local lisp files go.
> > lispdir=$(prefix)/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex
>
> So I presume there is now the directory
> /usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex which contains RefTeX's Elisp
> files?
Yes: address@hidden:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/reftex$ ls -al
-rw-r--r-- 1 root staff 8249 2009-06-26 11:01 reftex.el
(I deleted some files from the list due to readability)
>
> > The fun starts when Emacs then gives "RefTeX version 4.31", and at the
> > same time "This manual documents RefTeX version 2009-04-29 from
> > 2009-04-29."(as I did the proposals mentioned below) I also looked for
> > the library, reftex-base is not found,
> > but /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex.elc, which is the
> > original one from the Emacs package done by Ubuntu.
>
> What's the output of `C-h v load-path <RET>'?
load-path is a variable defined in `C source code'.
Its value is
("/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/auctex"
"/usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/chess"
"/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/chess/"
"/usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/gnuserv"
"/usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/emacs-goodies-el"
"/usr/share/emacs22/site-lisp/dictionaries-common"
"/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/autoconf"
"/etc/emacs22"
"/etc/emacs"
"/usr/local/share/emacs/22.2/site-lisp"
"/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/site-lisp"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/site-lisp/dictionaries-common"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/site-lisp/emacs-goodies-el"
"/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/leim"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/url"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/progmodes"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/play"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/obsolete"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/net"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/mh-e"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/mail"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/language"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/international"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/gnus"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/eshell"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/erc"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/emulation"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/emacs-lisp"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/calendar"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/calc"
"/usr/share/emacs/22.2/leim")
(Manual line breaks applied by me, also due to better readability)
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/08
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/11
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/19
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/21
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/23
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/23
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/25
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/25
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex,
Andreas Breitbach <=
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/26
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/27
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/27
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/27
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Ralf Angeli, 2009/06/27
- Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex, Andreas Breitbach, 2009/06/27