Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex

[Andreas Breitbach]

Am Donnerstag, den 11.06.2009, 21:05 +0200 schrieb Ralf Angeli:
> * Andreas Breitbach (2009-06-08) writes:
> 
> > Am Freitag, den 05.06.2009, 18:16 +0200 schrieb Ralf Angeli: 
> >> 
> >> You can get a backtrace by executing
> >> M-x toggle-debug-on-error <RET>
> >> before trying to insert the citation.
> >> 
> >> The problem might be due to something in the the .tex or .bib files.  So
> >> unless you provide sample files for reproducing the error, it will be
> >> hard to find its cause.
> >> 
> > Ok, I tried these settings, these are the results:
> >
> > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (args-out-of-range 21 37)
> >   replace-match("[34]" t t #("\\footcite[]{masala_kenneth_2005}" 0 12
> > nil 12 31 (face font-lock-constant-face) 31 32 nil))
> >   reftex-do-citation(nil nil nil)
> >   reftex-citation()
> >   call-interactively(reftex-citation)
> 
> This doesn't really help.  As mentioned before, a sample file might be
> useful.
> 
> > The reftex-*-citation complains on clicking that it "Can't find
> > library /usr/share/emacs/22.2/lisp/textmodes/reftex-cite.el". There are
> > some files in the respective directory, but they seem to be compiled
> > bytecode, having an *.elc.
> 
> Are you sure the installation of the CVS version went okay?  Didn't you
> install it below /usr/local?  Did you put `(require 'reftex)' into your
> init file as suggested by the installation instructions?  What's the
> output of `C-h v reftex-version <RET>'?
Finally I had time to re-check on the installation status of the CVS.
Indeed there have been some errors during installation(resulting in the 
non-application of the CVS version for Emacs), so I did give
it a second try. But now enabling Reftex (via M-x reftex-mode <RET>)
only gives an error, which I can't directly quote here(the text turns
to garbage as it seems to be interepreted as some Unicode-like
characters), so I attachted the saved buffer it came up in.
Hope that helps.

Backtrace
Description: Binary data