Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] 11.85; Biblatex vs. RefTex

[Ralf Angeli]

* Andreas Breitbach (2009-06-19) writes:

> Finally I had time to re-check on the installation status of the CVS.
> Indeed there have been some errors during installation(resulting in the 
> non-application of the CVS version for Emacs), so I did give
> it a second try. But now enabling Reftex (via M-x reftex-mode <RET>)
> only gives an error, which I can't directly quote here(the text turns
> to garbage as it seems to be interepreted as some Unicode-like
> characters), so I attachted the saved buffer it came up in.
> Hope that helps.
>
> Debugger entered--Lisp error: (void-variable reftex-ref-style-alist)
>   byte-code([...])
>   require(reftex-base)
>   byte-code([...])

This could be due to an old reftex-vars.el shadowing the new one.  Which
would mean that the installation was unsuccessful.  What's the output of
`M-x list-load-path-shadows <RET>' with respect to the RefTeX files?

-- 
Ralf