[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation |
Date: |
19 Jan 2004 09:35:44 +0200 |
> From: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
> Newsgroups: gnu.emacs.bug
> Date: 19 Jan 2004 07:51:57 +0100
> > >
> > > It serves no useful purpose, in my opinion, and it makes creating
> > > useful indices and keyword searches more difficult.
> >
> > How so? Please elaborate.
>
> If you do a full-text search for MS-?DOS, you won't find the relevant
> occurences.
I think there's an "MS-DOS" near every "MS-DOG" instance, but if you
find one place where this isn't true, please point me to it.
> Ok, so the sense of humor from Emacs users we are testing for is
> demonstrated by laughing about the beliefs of people whom they don't
> respect?
That's how I see it, yes. Note that I didn't create the MS-DOG name,
so this is simply my view of this issue.
> It's not exactly the definition of "humor" I would want to project.
It's one possible definition, I guess.
- Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Reuben Thomas, 2004/01/17
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/18
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Alan Mackenzie, 2004/01/19
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Richard Stallman, 2004/01/19
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Barry Margolin, 2004/01/20
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Eli Zaretskii, 2004/01/20
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, David Kastrup, 2004/01/20
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Sam Steingold, 2004/01/20
- Message not available
- Re: Variant spellings in GNU Emacs documentation, Barry Margolin, 2004/01/20