[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: use of locale in "ls" again (Re: Japanese expression of date)
|
From: |
Paul Eggert |
|
Subject: |
Re: use of locale in "ls" again (Re: Japanese expression of date) |
|
Date: |
Mon, 31 Dec 2001 13:05:15 -0800 (PST) |
> Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2001 20:08:57 +0900
> From: Tomohiro KUBOTA <address@hidden>
> Now people here are discussing about disabling localization of date
> format and use ISO format instead.
We're not talking about _disabling_ localized dates, as localized
dates will continue to be supported. The disagreement is over what
the default behavior should be outside the C locale.
- Re: use of locale in "ls" again (Re: Japanese expression of date), (continued)
- Re: use of locale in "ls" again (Re: Japanese expression of date), Paul Eggert, 2001/12/21
- Re: use of locale in "ls" again (Re: Japanese expression of date), Tomohiro KUBOTA, 2001/12/22
- Re: use of locale in "ls" again (Re: Japanese expression of date), Paul Eggert, 2001/12/23
- Re: use of locale in "ls" again, Markus Kuhn, 2001/12/23
- Re: use of locale in "ls" again (Re: Japanese expression of date), Tomohiro KUBOTA, 2001/12/24
- Re: use of locale in "ls" again (Re: Japanese expression of date), Paul Eggert, 2001/12/31
- Re: use of locale in "ls" again (Re: Japanese expression of date), Eli Zaretskii, 2001/12/23
- Re: use of locale in "ls" again (Re: Japanese expression of date), Tomohiro KUBOTA, 2001/12/24
- Re: use of locale in "ls" again (Re: Japanese expression of date), Thomas Bushnell, BSG, 2001/12/24
- Re: use of locale in "ls" again (Re: Japanese expression of date), Tomohiro KUBOTA, 2001/12/24
- Re: use of locale in "ls" again (Re: Japanese expression of date),
Paul Eggert <=