Surely, therefore, at least 1-ply or higher should
see the recube and the then dead cube situation and go to the DB for an exact
valid value.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 6:51
AM
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Use of Two-Sided
DB in matches
I should have said The problem is that the 2 sided
bearoff database is only guaranteed to be valid for money games. There
are match play situations where it is valid (dead cubes etc)
On
04/09/09 11:45 PM, "Michael Petch" <address@hidden>
wrote:
The problem is that the 2 sided bearoff database is
only valid for money games (its exact for that). In those situations it will
go right to the DB. If you take your same position and turn it into a money
session position you will see that it uses the values directly from the DB.
The bearoff database is not guaranteed to be accurate for score based
decisions. Yours is an interesting case because the 0 ply analysis that is
double pass is the static eval from the database + janowski.
One
other thing. If you are posting match play analysis it can also be helpful
to output as MWC.
On 04/09/09 11:30 PM, "Neil Robins" <address@hidden>
wrote:
It seems to me,
that where exact figures
|