[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupress] Using GCC - Proofreader's Role (newbie)
From: |
Lisa M. Opus Goldstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupress] Using GCC - Proofreader's Role (newbie) |
Date: |
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:59:43 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.28i |
This length sounds fine, and the three pages should give us plenty of
breathing room. If we do go over by a few, that is fine also. Our
current publishing method does not use signatures.
So, no need to worry about it!
-Lisa
Simon Law <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 03:15:59PM -0400, James Howison wrote:
> > I am concentrating on two things - readability, logical consistency and
> > saving space.
> >
> > I'm fairly sure that Lisa indicated that saving space is an important
> > part of this process as the more pages the more expensive to print and
> > ship - yet there is a limit to the prices that can be charged which
> > does not relate to the page count.
> >
> > So I'm providing aggressive and moderate options for saving space in my
> > sections.
> >
> > Is that correct Lisa?
>
> I don't think that editing can significantly reduce our page
> count. Right now, it is at 381, which is 24 signatures of 16 pages
> each. Our upper limit is 384 pages before we pop another signature in.
>
> If you feel like reworking, that would probably be something to
> ask about on the GCC mailing lists.
>
> Simon
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnupress mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnupress
--
Lisa M. Goldstein address@hidden
Managing Editor, GNU Press www.gnupress.org
Business Manager, Tel 617-542-5942
Free Software Foundation Fax 617-542-2652