[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The docs weren't building for me...
From: |
Sam Roberts |
Subject: |
Re: The docs weren't building for me... |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Oct 2001 16:28:09 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.23i |
Quoting Jeff Bailey <address@hidden>, who wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 16, 2001 at 12:48:25PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Actually we do. in configure.in, we call MU_MAINTAINER_MODE, which in
> turn calls AM_MAINTAINER_MODE.
>
> It's brokenness like this that makes me avoid it. Yuck. I don't see
> anything depends on -DMAINTAINER_MODE. I can add an --enable-debug
> flag, which I think is more accurate to what's asked for here.
Hmmm. I wonder if I'm doing something the hard way.
Right now I have a configure wrapper that I call "Cfg", it looks like:
---- Cfg ----
#!/bin/sh
aclocal -I m4
libtoolize --automake
autoheader
automake -a
autoconf
CFLAGS="-Wall -g" configure --disable-shared --disable-pthread
-------------
And I usually run it every time I cvs update.
Is there a better way of doing this? Would providing
--enable-maintainer-mode help me? My auto* knowledge is pretty much at
the "enough to port stuff to QNX" level.
Sam
--
Sam Roberts <address@hidden>
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., (continued)
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Jeff Bailey, 2001/10/15
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Alain Magloire, 2001/10/15
- Message not available
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Jeff Bailey, 2001/10/15
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Sam Roberts, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Jeff Bailey, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Jeff Bailey, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Jeff Bailey, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me...,
Sam Roberts <=
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Jeff Bailey, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Sam Roberts, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Jeff Bailey, 2001/10/16
- Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Sergey Poznyakoff, 2001/10/17
Re: The docs weren't building for me..., Alain Magloire, 2001/10/15