[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-tar] bug: extracting permissions
From: |
Sergey Poznyakoff |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-tar] bug: extracting permissions |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:45:25 +0200 |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> The NEWS file has this entry that is supposed to cover the issue.
> Does this entry need to be reworded? It's clear to me, but perhaps
> not to others.
>
> * New options --index-file, --no-overwrite-dir. The --overwrite-dir
> option is now the default; use --no-overwrite-dir if you prefer
> the previous default behavior.
No, I guess it is clear enough. Sorry I have overlooked it somehow.
Anyway, I would propose to change --same-permissions/--no-same-permissions
option names to something more meaningful to avoid confusion. For
example
--same-permissions --ignore-umask
--no-same-permissions --apply-umask
(of course retaining old names for compatibility)
Opinions?
Regards,
Sergey
- [Bug-tar] bug: extracting permissions, Toby Peterson, 2005/01/05
- Re: [Bug-tar] bug: extracting permissions, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2005/01/05
- Re: [Bug-tar] bug: extracting permissions, Toby Peterson, 2005/01/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] bug: extracting permissions, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2005/01/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] bug: extracting permissions, Toby Peterson, 2005/01/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] bug: extracting permissions, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2005/01/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] bug: extracting permissions, Toby Peterson, 2005/01/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] bug: extracting permissions, Paul Eggert, 2005/01/06
- Re: [Bug-tar] bug: extracting permissions,
Sergey Poznyakoff <=
- Re: [Bug-tar] bug: extracting permissions, Paul Eggert, 2005/01/10
- Re: [Bug-tar] bug: extracting permissions, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2005/01/11