[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel
From: |
Sean Chittenden |
Subject: |
Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:16:26 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4i |
> > > > At this point I'm thinking that Ruth probably offers the best
> > > > near-term solution. Since it essentially uses Matz's parse.y
> > > > it's compliant. We can get an AST out of it. From the AST we
> > > > can produce PIR which can be fed into imcc (at least that's
> > > > how I understand that it should be done).
> > >
> > > The announcement of the current version
> > > (http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/33555)
> > > describes the parser as "painfully incomplete".
> > >
> > > Does _ANYONE_ (besides Matz in the ruby source) have a parser
> > > that can reliably take ruby code and return an AST? I don't
> > > want to reinvent the wheel, but it's starting to look like there
> > > is no wheel.
> >
> > http://www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/ruby/downloads/files/nodeDump-0.1.7.tgz
>
> nodeDump prints out a representation of the internal parsetree for a
> Ruby program, but as far as I can tell, it doesn't return an AST
> that can be walked from within Ruby.
What format would you like it in though? -sc
--
Sean Chittenden
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, (continued)
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Erik Bågfors, 2002/11/13
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Phil Tomson, 2002/11/14
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Dan Sugalski, 2002/11/14
- [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, David Robins, 2002/11/14
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, Phil Tomson, 2002/11/14
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, Sean Chittenden, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, Phil Tomson, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel,
Sean Chittenden <=
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, Phil Tomson, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, David Robins, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] There Is No Wheel, Sean Chittenden, 2002/11/20
- [Cardinal-dev] ripper 0.0.5, David Robins, 2002/11/20
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Einar Karttunen, 2002/11/14
- Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Leon Brocard, 2002/11/14
Re: [Cardinal-dev] Ping?!, Phil Tomson, 2002/11/12