[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] is C_NO_PIC_NO_DLL necessary?
|
From: |
felix winkelmann |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] is C_NO_PIC_NO_DLL necessary? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:42:57 +0100 |
On 2/13/06, Brandon J. Van Every <address@hidden> wrote:
> Is C_NO_PIC_NO_DLL really important? It is used for static libraries,
> and Makefile.am has the following notation:
>
> # we add -DC_NO_PIC_NO_DLL seperately so that chicken-config does not
> # use -DC_NO_PIC_NO_DLL ... -DC_NO_PIC_NO_DLL is only for libtool
> # compiles
>
It's needed to compile statically linked apps on Windows. It's a bit
clunky, but does the job and should not bother the user as long
as he/she is using csc.
cheers,
felix