[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] Unit testing
From: |
Ivan Raikov |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] Unit testing |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Nov 2006 09:25:18 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
When I was looking for a suitable unit testing framework, I went
with `testeez' because it had simple examples I could follow. You
already have a testeez-like API in the `test-infrastructure' module,
so hard would it be to extend it so that unit tests that already use
testeez can seemlessly switch to test-infrastructure?
Kon Lovett <address@hidden> writes:
> I am not advocating "test-infrastructure" as the basis. It just
> already does a lot of what people want (even Felix uses it sometimes
> due to the HTML report - which I do not like but at least it exists).
> Also, do not forget that a lot Scheme code uses "testeez" &
> "SchemeUnit" already. (The 2 SRFI testing frameworks I don't think
> have much penetration. And "test-infrastructure" has none - except
> for me!) I wonder if some sort of "test result" coercion might allow
> all these different unit test frameworks to somehow slot in to a
> larger scale acceptance test framework.