Re: [Chicken-users] egg documentation

[Mark Fredrickson]

This idea dove tails with discussion last week of providing docstrings
for lambdas. Felix pointed out that there is a hook to capture lambda
documentation. Will this work for documenting eggs, which might also
have data types, parameters, other info?

Texi seems like a reasonable standard to me, FWIW.

Cheers,
-M

> I think the best alternative would be having svnwiki tags to markup
> chicken docs (which is possible).
>
> Something like:
>
>   <procedure name="foo" args="bar baz" retval="string">
>       <description>This is foo</description>
>   </procedure>
>
> From a known format, we can convert the wiki documentation to whatever
> format we need and even have an interactive documentation system.  The
> current problem with the wiki documentation is that we don't have
> semantic markup.
>
> Best wishes,
> Mario
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chicken-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/chicken-users
>