[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros |
Date: |
Wed, 22 Apr 2009 18:12:40 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Jim Ursetto scripsit:
> > Explicit renaming macros look neat; the only kinda "bummer" thing is
> > having to manually pull apart the components of the expression with
> > car/cdr/etc. instead of the destructuring happening in a more
> > automatic way. Of course, I imagine one could write a macro to do
> > this... :)
>
> Yes -- hence the matchable extension ;)
Matchable is kind of heavyweight compared to destructuring-bind,
although it can of course do the same job.
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/m_destru.htm
http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Issues/iss130_w.htm
--
You escaped them by the will-death John Cowan
and the Way of the Black Wheel. address@hidden
I could not. --Great-Souled Sam http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
- Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Thomas Chust, 2009/04/22
- Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, John Cowan, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, nefigah, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Jim Ursetto, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Jim Ursetto, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Jordan Cooper, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, John Cowan, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Jordan Cooper, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, John Cowan, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Jim Ursetto, 2009/04/22
- Re: Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-users] New to Scheme Macros, Alex Shinn, 2009/04/22