Re: [Chicken-users] Is there interest in a new egg (fast-io)?

[Mario Domenech Goulart]

On Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:11:25 -0300 Jeronimo Pellegrini <address@hidden> wrote:

>> I'd suggest naming the egg in a way it doesn't sound as general as
>> "faster I/O primitives".  Maybe it's just me, but when I read "fast-io",
>> I instinctively think that Chicken's I/O primitives are slow and by
>> using fast-io I'll get faster I/O for any case.  Again, it's only a
>> suggestion, maybe it's just me.
>
> Right!
>
> What would be more appropriate?
>
> "unsafe-io"
> "fast-unsafe-io"
> "unsafe-io-procedures"
> "nonstandard-fst-io"

How about "type-specific-io"?

Best wishes.
Mario