[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-users] (file-select ...) and compiler warnings
|
From: |
John Cowan |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-users] (file-select ...) and compiler warnings |
|
Date: |
Mon, 18 Feb 2013 22:15:37 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Jim Ursetto scripsit:
> I would be ok with adding usleep to the posix-extras egg if you want.
> I'm not sure if it should be a separate function or just override
> (sleep) to accept fractional values. I'm thinking the latter.
+1. Conceptually, a sleep duration is inherently inexact, and it makes
sense to model it with an inexact number.
--
In politics, obedience and support John Cowan <address@hidden>
are the same thing. --Hannah Arendt http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
- [Chicken-users] (file-select ...) and compiler warnings, J Altfas, 2013/02/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] (file-select ...) and compiler warnings, Jim Ursetto, 2013/02/17
- Re: [Chicken-users] (file-select ...) and compiler warnings, J Altfas, 2013/02/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] (file-select ...) and compiler warnings, Jim Ursetto, 2013/02/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] (file-select ...) and compiler warnings, J Altfas, 2013/02/18
- Re: [Chicken-users] posix-extras sleep, Jim Ursetto, 2013/02/19
- Re: [Chicken-users] posix-extras sleep, Jim Ursetto, 2013/02/19
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Chicken-users] posix-extras sleep, J Altfas, 2013/02/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] posix-extras sleep, Jim Ursetto, 2013/02/20
- Re: [Chicken-users] (file-select ...) and compiler warnings,
John Cowan <=
Re: [Chicken-users] (file-select ...) and compiler warnings, Felix, 2013/02/18