Re: [cp-patches] RFC: checking for socklen_t

[Tom Tromey]

>>>>> "Twisti" == Christian Thalinger <address@hidden> writes:

Twisti> And on this system socklen_t isn't defined.  This macro taken from
Twisti>  http://ac-archive.sourceforge.net/Miscellaneous/type_socklen_t.html

I assume we can use macros from here in Classpath.

Twisti> 2006-01-01  Christian Thalinger  <address@hidden>
Twisti>         * configure.ac: Added TYPE_SOCKLEN_T call.
Twisti>         * m4/type_socklen_t: Added.

This is ok.

Twisti> +  if test $ac_cv_type_socklen_t != yes; then
Twisti> +    AC_DEFINE(socklen_t, int, [Substitute for socklen_t])
Twisti> +  fi

Kind of a bogus approach (better to use a real typedef), but whatever.

Tom